According to Anies, this phenomenon erodes honest requirements, and he highlighted its adverse impact, particularly when it takes place at the highest possible degrees of institutions, such as the Constitutional Court.
On the night of Tuesday, December 12, 2023, governmental prospect second, Prabowo Subianto, took part in the first presidential discussion for the 2024 election at the General Election Commission (KPU) office in Menteng, Jakarta. During this occasion, Prabowo engaged in a debate with presidential prospect primary, Anies Baswedan, pertaining to air contamination in Jakarta.
Prabowo seized the opportunity to pose a question to Anies, who worked as the previous Guv of Jakarta, regarding the severe air contamination in the resources city.
” DKI (Jakarta) usually receives the highest possible air pollution index worldwide. How is it that with a spending plan of Rp80 trillion, Mr. Anies couldn’t do something substantial to reduce air pollution?” Prabowo inquired.
Anies responded by discussing the presence of air pollution surveillance gadgets in Jakarta. He highlighted that when air pollution originates from within the city, it stays continually high– today, tomorrow, or the complying with week.
Air pollution does not have an ID card, and the wind doesn’t have an ID card. When contaminants from power plants circulation right into Jakarta, the city registers high contamination levels. When air pollution moves to Lampung or Sumatra, there are no monitoring gadgets there,” Anies clarified.
Anies continued to lay out the measures required to address air pollution, including discharges control from car, the electrification of public transport, and the conversion of public cars.
” In the past, there were 350,000 everyday guests on public transport; currently, there are 1 million day-to-day passengers. We have actually been servicing this to take on pollution in Jakarta,” Anies responded.
Prabowo provided his point of view on Anies’s solution, expressing confusion over Anies’s tendency to connect air pollution in Jakarta to the wind.
” It’s testing when we blame the wind. If we criticize the wind and rainfall, perhaps we don’t need a federal government,” Prabowo mentioned.
Prabowo’s Feedback to Ganjar’s Question Concerning the Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Presidential Candidate Age Limit
Governmental prospect number 3, Ganjar Pranowo, presented a concern to presidential prospect second, Prabowo Subianto, pertaining to the Constitutional Court’s decision on the age restriction for governmental and vice-presidential prospects. Below is Prabowo’s reaction during the initial governmental argument for the 2024 political election held at the General Political Election Compensation (KPU) office in Menteng, Jakarta, on Tuesday, December 12, 2023.
I have to ask this inquiry. Ganjar asked.
Prabowo was given the chance to reply to Ganjar’s inquiry.
“Regarding the Constitutional Court, the regulations are clear. We improve what is not excellent, and we are committed to abiding by the legislation itself,” Prabowo responded.
Anies discussed these 2 occasions, highlighting that justice has actually not been really felt, specifically by the victims’ families.
Ganjar replied to the question, sharing his optimism in supplying justice for the sufferers and their families. He pointed out, “I assume these two problems have ended up being public talk. In Kanjuruhan, we can meet fact-finders to secure victims, solve their concerns from a justice point of view, including KM5When we fix all this, we move a progression. Can we after that pursue legal processes and discover fair choices? My answer is yes,” he claimed in the governmental discussion on Tuesday (12/12/2023).
Ganjar stressed that the government should be strong in dealing with these cases to stop previous concerns from dragging out and being repetitively raised in governmental discussions. “The federal government should dare to not allow previous troubles remain and become sensitive problems as a result of indecisiveness. We should quit these strategies and be strong and crucial,” Ganjar stated.
He suggested the idea of reintroducing the Fact and Reconciliation Payment Act (UU KKR). “Sometimes we also require to believe on a bigger range. Let’s reestablish the UU KKR, to make sure that all civils rights problems can be dealt with this way, enabling the nation to progress without being held back by unsolved problems. We need to settle them,” claimed Ganjar.
However, Anies took into consideration Ganjar’s response to be insufficient, stating that the problem is a lot more complex. According to Anies, four points should be done: making sure the legal procedure supplies justice, exposing all facts for closure, compensating sufferers, and making sure such occurrences do not repeat.
Anies included, “We have to not be obscure. If these 4 jobs are necessary, the first thing we might have to do is reinvestigate, evaluate, and make certain the safety and security of institutions.
Ganjar replied, “Relating to comprehensiveness, it refers taste and subjectivity.” He thought that nearly all factors raised by Anies were already being resolved.
“Victim protection is underway, and fact-finders are in area. We don’t think twice, so we likewise made clear question number 2 because we’re not ones to postpone or hang job for it to end up being an asset. I work on it,” Ganjar firmly mentioned.
If you loved this article and you would such as to get even more info regarding pemilu adalah; https://www.liputan6.com/tag/pemilu-2024, kindly visit our own web-site.