Ganjar reacted to the inquiry, revealing his positive outlook in supplying justice for the targets and their households. In Kanjuruhan, we can satisfy with fact-finders to shield sufferers, resolve their concerns from a justice point of view, including KM5When we solve all this, we move an action ahead. Ganjar stressed that the federal government must be vibrant in solving these instances to avoid previous concerns from dragging on and being repetitively brought up in governmental discussions. Let’s reestablish the UU KKR, so that all human civil liberties problems can be settled in this means, permitting the nation to proceed without being held back by unresolved issues. We have to fix them,” claimed Ganjar.
Governmental prospect (Capres) Ganjar Pranowo specified that the shortage of subsidized fertilizers is not restricted to Central Java, shooting down accusations made by Presidential candidate number 2, Prabowo Subianto, during the Presidential Discussion. In the debate, Prabowo criticized the farmer card (kartu tani) plan executed by Ganjar Pranowo while he was working as the Governor of Central Java, asserting that it made it difficult for farmers to gain access to subsidized plant foods.
In reaction to Prabowo’s findings, Presidential prospect number 3 cleared up that the deficiency of subsidized plant foods is not exclusive to Central Java. He stated that this problem is prevalent in various other areas of Indonesia also, such as Papua, North Sumatra, East Nusa Tenggara (NTT), West Nusa Tenggara (NTB), East Kalimantan, and despite having gasoline. Ganjar specified, “However, for If you adored this write-up and you would certainly like to obtain more facts relating to anggota kpps kindly go to our own web site. Mr. Prabowo, I need to remind him that the deficiency of fertilizer is additionally occurring in Papua, North Sumatra, NTT, NTB, East Kalimantan, consisting of fuel.”
Is Ganjar’s statement regarding the shortage of subsidized fertilizers not being restricted to Central Java accurate? Allow’s fact-check this insurance claim.
Fact-Checking:
In a write-up entitled “Farmers in Garut Complain Regarding the Deficiency of Subsidized Fertilizers and Farmer Card Distribution,” released on the bandung.bisnis.com site on March 19, 2023, it was reported that a number of teams of farmers in Garut Regency, West Java, were encountering difficulties in obtaining subsidized plant foods. A member of the Regional People’s Rep Council (DPRD) of West Java, Deden Galih, stated that in some areas of Garut Regency, farmers were finding it challenging to accessibility subsidized plant foods, and when they might obtain them, it was typically at high prices.
In this article, Otong Wiranta, the Chairman of the Call Farmers and Fishermen Empowerment (KTNA) of West Java, stated that the circulation of subsidized fertilizers was still encountering different difficulties in the field. Some of the obstacles consisted of farmers not being signed up, and also signed up farmers not being able to retrieve subsidized plant foods.
In a write-up titled “Farmers in Katingan Kuala Complain About the Shortage of Subsidized Fertilizers,” published on the dayaknews.com website, it was reported that farmers in Bangun Jaya Town, Katingan Kuala Subdistrict, Katingan Regency, Central Kalimantan, were complaining regarding the scarcity of subsidized plant foods and medicines. Yuda Anwar, a member of the Mekar Jaya Farmers Team in Bangun Jaya Town, specified that the scarcity of plant foods and medicines had resulted in less abundant rice crops and had negatively influenced harvest yields. He discussed that lots of rice crops were shriveling as a result of an absence of nutrients and were vulnerable to pest strikes.
Verdict:
Based on the fact-checking, Ganjar Pranowo’s statement that the deficiency of subsidized plant foods is not restricted to Central Java is accurate. Reports from different areas in Indonesia, consisting of West Java and Central Kalimantan, verify that farmers have actually been facing troubles in accessing subsidized fertilizers. This details opposes Prabowo Subianto’s case that the problem was exclusive to Central Java.
Presidential prospect number two, Prabowo Subianto, reacted to the sights expressed by presidential candidate top, Anies Baswedan, regarding the state of democracy in Indonesia. Prabowo stated that Anies was overemphasizing the issues with Indonesian democracy and shared a tale about Anies’ political election as Governor of DKI Jakarta, during which Prabowo was in the resistance.
” Mr. Anies is rather exaggerating the problems with democracy. You were elected as the Guv of DKI Jakarta while encountering the judgment federal government, and I supported you,” said Prabowo during the very first governmental argument held at the KPU on Tuesday (12/12/2023).
Prabowo stressed that Anies can not have actually become the Guv of DKI Jakarta if democracy did not function appropriately. He insisted that if Head of state Jokowi were an authoritarian, Anies would not have had the ability to hold that position.
Anies had formerly shared his problem that the people no more trusted the recurring democratic procedure. He outlined three important facets of freedom: freedom of expression, a free resistance that can criticize the federal government and equilibrium it, and a transparent and reasonable electoral process. According to Anies, the first 2 aspects were currently facing issues, leading to a decline in autonomous values.
The exchange highlighted the prospects’ varying perspectives on the state of freedom in Indonesia, with Prabowo responding to Anies’ critique by stressing the performance of democracy during Anies’ political election as Governor of Jakarta.
[Video: VIDEO CLIP: Pre-Debate Event for Prabowo-Gibran Discussion, The Atmosphere at the Jakarta South Location Prior To the Event] (https://www.vidio.com/watch/7779619-jelang-nobar-debat-prabowo-gibran-begini-suasana-lokasi-acara-di-jakarta-selatan).
Gibran came with Prabowo to the discussion, and they departed from Prabowo’s house in Jakarta. Upon leaving his home, Prabowo took a minute to allow among his advocates, who determined himself as being from Banyumas, to take a photo with him. Prabowo happily described the fan as “orba,” brief for “orang Banyumas” or “person from Banyumas.” Gibran Rakabuming Raka signed up with Prabowo in a white Alphard vehicle as they headed to the argument place.
The argument’s technical style was clarified by the Chairman of the General Political Election Compensation of the Republic of Indonesia (KPU RI), Hasyim Asy’ari. He guaranteed that the very first presidential dispute of the 2024 political election would not follow the typical “cerdas cermat” (quiz) format. Instead, there would be extra communications in between the candidates, with a total of 150 mins split right into 6 sections. Each sector would include 3 questions, and the candidates would react to them reciprocally. The first prospect to address a concern can after that react to the other 2 candidates’ comments, supplying an ending declaration at the end of the section. This format was made to encourage more dynamic interactions during the dispute.