On the various other hand, presidential candidate number 2, Prabowo Subianto, stated that corruption is a betrayal of the country. If you treasured this article and you would like to collect more info regarding kpps Pemilu (https://www.merdeka.com/jateng/Kpps-adalah-kelompok-penyelenggara-pemilihan-suara-pemilu-ketahui-tugas-dan-wewenangnya-60582-mvk.html) generously visit our web page. He highlighted the need to strengthen not only the KPK yet likewise the police, prosecution, and various other establishments that help in mitigating corruption.
Selama perjalanan kampanyenya di Indonesia, terutama di wilayah timur Indonesia seperti Papua, Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT), dan Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB), Ganjar Pranowo menemukan sejumlah ketimpangan dalam akses kesehatan, pekerjaan, dan fasilitas pendidikan. Ia mencatat bahwa masyarakat di ketiga provinsi tersebut mengalami kesulitan dalam mendapatkan akses kesehatan yang memadai.
Ganjar’s statement throughout the dispute was as complies with: “In my opinion, Mr. Prabowo, it does not appear to be enough. Ganjar expressed his commitment to improving all public centers, from medical care to education, based on the desires and responses obtained throughout their campaign. Ganjar vowed to execute a program of one medical care employee per village to deal with such difficulties.
Throughout the governmental discussion held on Tuesday, December 12, 2023, governmental prospect Prabowo Subianto talked about the complex problem of dealing with problems in Papua. Prabowo acknowledged that managing Papua is a challenging issue with foreign interference and stressed the importance of civils rights (HAM) as the primary problem, prioritizing the security of the individuals.
According to Ganjar Pranowo, the solutions suggested by Prabowo are not sufficient. Ganjar shared his perspective that discussion is vital to unite all stakeholders to attend to the concern properly.
Ganjar’s statement throughout the discussion was as follows: “In my viewpoint, Mr. Prabowo, it does not appear to be sufficient. Dialogue is something critical to ensure that all parties can sit together, as it is the root of the issue. Do you concur with the discussion version I am recommending?”
Along with his reaction during the debate, Ganjar Pranowo likewise shared his experiences from his campaign trail with his running friend, Mahfud Md. They began on a journey from the easternmost point in Sabang to Merauke in the west, aiming to listen to and observe the hopes and requirements of the people.
Ganjar expressed his commitment to improving all public facilities, from health care to education, based upon the goals and responses obtained during their project. He highlighted a heartfelt experience in Merauke, where a neighborhood priest functioned as a midwife as a result of the lack of medical care access. This priest learned to assist a mom in childbirth by viewing educational video clips on YouTube. Ganjar vowed to carry out a program of one healthcare worker per town to deal with such difficulties.
Ganjar Pranowo mentioned an issue uncovered during their check out to Sabang, where they located that teachers were not receiving enough focus and assistance from the government. He emphasized the demand for boosted focus and assistance in this field.
To conclude, Ganjar Pranowo replied to Prabowo Subianto’s approach to taking care of the Papua problem by highlighting the importance of discussion and shared his commitment to attending to different public problems, especially in medical care and education, based upon his project experiences.
Governmental prospect number two, Prabowo Subianto, dealt with the obstacles faced by farmers in obtaining fertilizer, especially approximately Central Java. He made these remarks in response to statements by presidential prospect Ganjar Pranowo regarding governance and the renovation of public services, specifically for at risk groups, consisting of women, children, and people with specials needs.
Prabowo at first discussed that vulnerable teams, consisting of farmers and anglers, encountered difficulties. He stated, “In my sight, vulnerable teams also consist of farmers and anglers.
Prabowo disclosed that several farmers had issues regarding Ganjar’s program throughout his period as Guv, known as the Farmer’s Card (Kartu Tani), which was meant to give farming support. Prabowo emphasized that farmers in fact preferred a less complex process for obtaining plant food.
On the other hand, presidential candidate number 3, Ganjar Pranowo, reacted to a concern regarding administration and the improvement of public services throughout the debate. Moderator Valerina Daniel read the concern presented by a panelist, which highlighted the stagnancy of the general public solution index in Indonesia. The question likewise stressed the requirement for equivalent treatment and focus to susceptible teams, such as ladies, children, and individuals with impairments. Ganjar was inquired about his tactical program to improve the high quality of fair civil services.
Ganjar started by discussing his 10 years of experience in attending to such concerns and mentioned, “I have ten years of experience in handling this matter, involving them from the start.” He outlined two essential approaches to address the question.
First, he stressed the importance of including women, individuals with specials needs, kids, and also parents in every Musrenbang (local growth planning conference). This inclusive method aimed to make certain that these teams’ problems and needs were thought about in decision-making processes. Ganjar believed that accomplishing equality in development planning was important to represent what these groups wished for, ultimately decreasing complaints.
Second, Ganjar stressed the requirement for public oversight of federal government agencies. Ganjar advocated for the greatest levels of government to take action when needed, ultimately leading to improved services and the affirmation of these vulnerable teams.
In summary, Prabowo Subianto articulated problems regarding farmers’ access to plant food in Central Java, while Ganjar Pranowo described his tactical method to enhance civil services, emphasizing inclusivity and public oversight as crucial elements of his method during the governmental debate.